The fund management focuses on global companies that make a positive contribution to solving challenges such as climate change, water scarcity or demographic change with their products and services and show high profitable growth. Bottom-up stock selection includes classic fundamental data as well as sustainability criteria. Risks, especially in the ESG area, are avoided by excluding companies that do not pursue a sustainability approach and whose activities are not ESG-compliant. The fund management identifies companies that offer added value for the environment and society through their products and/or services.
Investment in global growth companies of all sizes
Concentrated portfolio of approximately 40-60 stocks
Benchmark-agnostic selection
Focus on positive contribution and sustainable growth
Further details on the opportunities and risks of this fund can be found in the sales prospectus.
Indexed performance
Performance in 12-month periods
Currencies
Sectors
Countries
Asset classes
Top Holdings
Monthly market comment
The US elections, increased geopolitical risks in the Middle East and a mixed reporting season are fuelling growing volatility in the capital markets. The Berenberg Sustainable World Fund underperformed its benchmark in October. Last month, rising interest rates had a negative impact on Grenergy's share price performance. Straumann gave up the price gains it made in the previous month, mainly due to weak performance in North America. Marvell's shares rose significantly in October. The main reason for this was positive indications from customers and competitors regarding the growth outlook in the data centre sector. Shares in Secure Energy Services, the western Canadian market leader in waste management and recycling services, also performed well following another set of strong quarterly results. We initiated new positions in Johnson Controls and Sartorius Stedim. In October, we sold Sandvik, Infineon, ASML and Elevance Health.
Portfolio Management
Bernd Deeken
Bernd Deeken has been a Portfolio Manager at Berenberg since April 2011. Within the Equity Fund Management, he oversees funds and special mandates with a focus on sustainability. Previously, he worked in asset management in the area of multi-asset mandates. After his dual studies at the Berufsakademie für Bankwirtschaft in Hannover (including a bank schooling), he completed his Masters in Banking and Finance in Zurich and Aberdeen. He is a Chartered Alternative Investment Analyst (CAIA) and is a CFA Charterholder.
Bernd Deeken
Portfolio Manager
Consideration of ESG Elements
Identifying companies and business models that will be successful in the long term is the basis for good investment decisions. Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) factors are key factors in decision making and are therefore integral components of the investment process.
The CO₂ Intensity (Scope 1 & 2emissions) per company is multiplied by is portfolio weight (current value of the investment by current portfolio value) and summedup. This weighted average CO₂ Intensity provides an indication ofthe portfolio’s exposure to CO₂ emission intensive companies. The unit is in tons of CO₂ per USD 1 million revenues.
The fund does not actively manage its carbon footprint, however, emissions data such as CO2 intensity are relevant parameters which can be used to assess the efficient management of a company and the extent of transition risks.
ESG Score
Using a score between 0 (lowest) and 10 (highest), MSCI ESG assesses the ability of portfolio holdings to identify and manage environmental, social and governance-related risks compared to peers. The ESG scores are assigned at the holding level and are aggregated at the portfolio level as the weighted average ESG Score.
The data provider MSCI ESG uses an ESG score of 0 to 10 to assess the management of material ESG risks of portfolio holdings compared to competitors.
ESG Controversies Screen
MSCI ESG analyses controversial business practices from the five areas environment, human rights, labour rights & supply management, customers and governance. The controversies are rated according to their reputational risk as well as the operational handling by a flagging system. Green indicates no or weak controversies, yellow indicates moderate controversies, orange indicates severe controversies and red indicates very severe controversies.
Investments in the fund are monitored for ESG controversies and, with the help of MSCI ESG data, flagged according their severity. Thereby, potential ESG risks of investments are identified. In the case of an orange flag (severe controversy), we enter into an active exchange with the company. In the case of a red flag (very severe controversy), the company is excluded.
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
For our funds with a "Positive Impact" focus, we showcase to which of the United Nations SDGs ourportfolio positions positively contribute. For this purpose, we focus on 10 investable goals. According to its contribution, each investment is assigned to one to max. three goals. Portfolio weights are shown along the respective SDGs - in the case of investments that contribute to several SDGs, the portfolio weight is allocated proportionately to the SDGs.